Re: [tex-live] teTeX: no next release
Sebastian Rahtz <[email protected]> Tue, 30 May 2006 17:33:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > > Thanks to Thomas (and others), getting a fully functional TeXMF system > took as much as insert SUSE DVD, click button. In comparison, what's TeX > Live? A CD which contains a TeXMF system which runs off that CD? Very > useful for evaluating the software. I did that 15 years ago. Is > installing TL to hard disk more of the make-install insanity? Thanks but > no thanks. Other platforms? None here, so not exactly a draw-card. There > wasn't anything going for TL in the past (well for me). > The primary worth if TeXLive, to my mind, is not its current instantiation as a CD or DVD, but in the fact that it has a coherent and sustainable catalogue of packages and collections. From these you can build a set of Debian packages (done), or a set of of RPMs (someone should try), or whatever, by writing some scripts to read the XML control files. > If distributors can package up TL then it's fine, but currently tetex is > 280MB and I expect distributors might be re-evaluating inclusion of it > if it jumps up by a lot. Would it be advisable/possible to split TL > somehow sensible? thats exactly what I did about 10 years ago when I started TL, into a more modular set of collections than teTeX... > Can TL be turned into an rpm on-the-fly for disk > installation? > in theory, though it could be disk intensive -- Sebastian Rahtz Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk