Re: Redhat and Tetex
"A.Mani" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>Robin Fairbairns wrote: >> >> >> >>>>Question: is tetex included fine on RedHat 9? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>in my experience (i.e., since redhat 6), redhat have never included a >>>sensible tex bundle. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>On the RedHat site, I am unable to understand whether tetex 2.0 is >>>>what they package. If instead they still offer a older version, would >>>>it work for pdflatex? >>>> >>>>On the RedHat site, I see f7b6d320.enc listed within the cygwin >>>>packages (see http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/packages/, within >>>>tetex-tiny), but that is not what I need, is it? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>no: nothing to do with linux, to first order. >>> >>>i don't believe that there's the slightest chance, now, that redhat will >>>_ever_ bother with tex. the non-tetex thing (fedora), the inheritor of >>>tetex but on the debian model, will i expect get its act together; but >>>the stability of yet another developer community to parallel debian has >>>to be doubted. >>> >>>i'm very depressed about linux. :-( >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Fedora Core has the latest version (2.02) of tetex. I think debian is unduly obsessed with stability...mandrake 9.0+ also includes the latest version of tetex. A.Mani member, Cal.Math.Soc.