Re: Redhat and Tetex
Robin Fairbairns <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
brett mccoy wrote: > A.Mani wrote: > > > Fedora Core has the latest version (2.02) of tetex. I think debian > > is unduly obsessed with stability...mandrake 9.0+ also includes the > > latest version of tetex. > > Debian Sid also has v2.02 of tetex. both of which are irrelevant to the original question. redhat always has been cr@p with tex, and the fact that a non-redhat thing, on a redhat server, is better doesn't help. and they're also irrelevant to people who've been using redhat up to now. redhat has washed its hands of the home/academic market; where we all go depends on what level of personal/sysadmin effort we can afford[*] to expend. linux stands a chance of long-term impact, so long as it remains free. there are powerful forces, in redmond and the like, wanting it not to remain free. redmond has now won the battle that started when redhat became a commercial operation. next target...? [*] note, there's no _money_ available for sysadmin effort, in universities, to first order. which is why the paid-for distributions can probably count on a tiny percentage of the academic user base. academics _have_ to pay m$, so there's nothing left for anything else significant.