Re: Redhat and Tetex

Sebation wrote:

> > > so no-one sees any point in working on it.  i'll see about getting
> > > it withdrawn from distributions, next month when we all meet.  (we,
> > > including one of the authors of passivetex.)
> > 
> > Yes please.  What are the former-passivetex community using in
> > preference now?
> 
> Personally, I just avoid making paper, if I can. I
> use the web :-}
> 
> I am tending to go back to horrible old ways by converting
> XML to LaTeX and running pdflatex. 
> 
> PassiveTeX is fine, if you work with its limitations;
> unfortunately for many people there seems to be an
> unbreakable bond between XML, Docbook and Norm Walsh's stylesheets.
> And that is the setup that has problems. 

Maybe the following helps:

==> http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/

..Rolf
-- 
|| Rolf Niepraschk c/o Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt    ||
|| Abbestr. 2-12; D-10587 Berlin, Germany                       ||
|| Tel/Fax: ++49-30-3481-316/490, email: [email protected] ||