Re: environment variable
Oliver Grewe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tetex.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
first thanks for all answers! > > I recommend not to modify latex macros like \usepackage or \input at > all, it certainly will lead to confusion in the future. > > There is no good reason to use env-vars in (la)tex. > > The most straightforward way in teTeX-3 is to put user files into > $TEXMFHOME, which usually is $HOME/texmf. > > Reinhard > Here is one example why we want the flexibility of using $HOME in our documents: ##### user1 is working on part-x of a machine 'a', the calculating system produce in $HOME/machine-a/part-xy/part-x lots of files from calculations etc. and also latex-files automatically. This user1 can also add some description to these latex-files manually user2 is working on the same machine 'a' but on part-y, so he has also several files in $HOME/machine-a/part-xy/part-y when both users are ready, both will checkin with CVS (Concurrent Versions System) their files and also their latex stuff ! NOTE: When one of them wants to create a report on machine-a/part-xy, he will need from part-x and part-y all latex-files from the other user/users. He (this user) will do an update in $HOME/machine-a/part-xy and should get all files which user1 and user2 produced and cheked into CVS. because he used the $HOME env-variable in the latex -files he is now able to produce the report(s) for machine 'a' ! ##### we cannot move all latex-files in $HOME/texmf, we have here about 10 machines, one machine has about 12000 parts! ... with 100 GB data, all under control of CVS I would prefer not to change our system now, it's too much work! so if we cannot work with $HOME in tetex-3, we must go back to tetex-2 and stay on this version? i hope it is now more clear why we want this easy way of using $HOME in latex. thx Olli