Re: Choice of processor
Philip Taylor <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Mar 2025 13:38:56 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texhax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/03/2025 12:54, Joseph Wright wrote: > > That's a typo: Hans has swapped over \saveimageresource and > \useimageresource - it happens. > Do you think that the same happened here, Joseph ? As written, this stretch of text appears to make no sense — > LuaTEX accepts optional dimension parameters for \use...resource in > the same format as for > rules. With images, these dimensions are then used instead of the ones > given to \useimageresource > No, neither XeTeX nor LuaTeX have formal definitions in the same way TeX > does - the LuaTeX manual is more like most other programming references > I'm familiar with, it has some gaps. For obvious reasons I have no idea with which programming languages (other than TeX) you are most familiar, but as one who cut his programming teeth on Algol-68, I for one am a great believer in programming languages having a well-documented formal syntax. When Peter Breitenlohner re-wrote <https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://ctan.math.washington.edu/tex-archive/systems/doc/etex/etex_man.pdf> my original version of the e-TeX manual <https://mirror.gutenberg-asso.fr/tex.loria.fr/moteurs/etex_ref.html>, he added formal syntax definitions, and while I still prefer my version from some perspectives, his addition of formal syntax definitions was, I believe, a very significant improvement. And it therefore goes without saying that I believe that the LuaTeX manual would similarly benefit from such inclusion. -- /** Phil./