Re: html variations and incompatibility and .init files

> This isn't a valid construct but it works in 3.2 browsers?

I can't test, but I guess it does. 

> This sounds good.  I'd like to see it committed.  The Makefile.am's 

I believe it is commited.

> should be altered to install them in some sort of data dir, I think, as 
> well as that dir being provided as an include path for -init_file, I 
> think, so that installed init files can be sourced (mode switching) 
> without a complete path.

I totally agree with that. This shouldn't be hard to do, as there is allready
a provision for include dirs.

Pat