Re: html variations and incompatibility and .init files

> Yes.  This sounds like a great idea!

The html32.init should do that. However I am not certain what html 2.0
browser will do with the generated html.

> I think browsers, even the old ones, can usually be counted on to ignore 
> unrecognized tags and attributes.  I've been letting tidy put summaries 
> in my tables for awhile and haven't heard complaints.  I'm not sure 
> that's a large sample, since I've been largely ignoring the cvshome.org 
> admin list for awhile, but some users send the reports directly to me or 
> to [email protected] and I haven't heard that complaint.

I think we can keep html32.init for old browsers and add summary and other
new attributes (class, ...) to the default init file.

Pat