Re: handling of different encodings

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dumas Patrice wrote:

>>There is one good reason to have the code detect at run time though - we
>>would no longer be able to distribute an architecture independant
>>version of the script.  It would have to be built on each platform or at
>>least we would have to distribute two versions, but as things stand we
>>almost have to do that anyhow.
>
>
>We can still distribute the script with no handling of encodings. It is
>the most generic one.
>
>Anyway there are much more possibilities if the init files distributed with
>texi2html are used, thus distributing the script is likely to be
suboptimal.
>
>Pat


True, but I was thinking along the lines of the distributing an RPM that
requires perl vs. one that requires perl-5.8.  Anyway, I think this is
probably no big deal.

Derek

- --
                *8^)

Email: [email protected]

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAI+5vLD1OTBfyMaQRAjHGAJwI2u+5rhR8H4ztPp6HkpOYnKCVjACgwfqH
NQRJLRfofEGGIn0M/4jMP0U=
=Fmbq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----