Re: when split put in a directory
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:21:54 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texi2html.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com> |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I don't have a strong opinion on this one way or another, but you do make me wonder why makeinfo creates split info files in the current directory but puts split HTML in a subdirectory? Derek Dumas Patrice wrote: >Hi, > >When the output is split the current default is to put it in the current >directory. Maybe we could instead put it in a directory named after the manual >name. This is bad as this wouldn't be backward compatible, but >- it is what makeinfo does >- it allows for an unsplit manual in the base directory, while the split > manual is in a sub directory, and allows for having a lot of manuals in the > same directory, as the splitted files are in sub directory. >- it is consistent with what will be the cross manual references produced > by makeinfo, and texi2html if we follow the same conventions (and I strongly > support that, such that we can do ref to manuals generated by makeinfo > and vice versa). > >Pat > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > - -- *8^) Email: [email protected] Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAJ93RLD1OTBfyMaQRAmpcAJ9XQcf4H7iHSp1WbfI3XJ7MrCR/PwCcDSpJ Vz2AdZPgzlNMpqm/Jc1bDzE= =J2Mq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----