Re: when split put in a directory

Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:21:54 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.texi2html.devel
Organization Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com>
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I don't have a strong opinion on this one way or another, but you do
make me wonder why makeinfo creates split info files in the current
directory but puts split HTML in a subdirectory?

Derek

Dumas Patrice wrote:

>Hi,
>
>When the output is split the current default is to put it in the current
>directory. Maybe we could instead put it in a directory named after the
manual
>name. This is bad as this wouldn't be backward compatible, but
>- it is what makeinfo does
>- it allows for an unsplit manual in the base directory, while the split
>  manual is in a sub directory, and allows for having a lot of manuals
in the
>  same directory, as the splitted files are in sub directory.
>- it is consistent with what will be the cross manual references produced
>  by makeinfo, and texi2html if we follow the same conventions (and I
strongly
>  support that, such that we can do ref to manuals generated by makeinfo
>  and vice versa).
>
>Pat
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

- --
                *8^)

Email: [email protected]

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAJ93RLD1OTBfyMaQRAmpcAJ9XQcf4H7iHSp1WbfI3XJ7MrCR/PwCcDSpJ
Vz2AdZPgzlNMpqm/Jc1bDzE=
=J2Mq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----