Re: fix bug in french translation and another issue

Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:44:22 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.texi2html.devel
Organization Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com>
Message-ID <[email protected]>
To answer your question, I don't know and can't spare the time to test 
it right now, but your fix sounds logical.

I grepped the source and found your previous contribution and we need 
more contributors, so, if you will tell me whether you prefer your 
`patpertusus' or your `pertusus' login on cvshome.org, I will add you as 
a developer to the project and you can make the changes yourself.  I 
will delete the unwanted user ID, as well.

Hope you'll join us!

Derek

-- 
                *8^)

Email: [email protected]

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-- 
I will not bribe Principal Skinner.
I will not bribe Principal Skinner.
I will not bribe Principal Skinner...

          - Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_


Dumas Patrice wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I send the french translation a few years ago, and it was incorporated in the
>cvs. There was an error but I wasn't able to access cvs, and the mail
>I sent to the maintainer were unanswered.
>
>I have just found that the development continued here, thus I post 
>the patch against 1.66 which corrects this little bug.
>
>There is another issue:
>
>para@^{i}tre, appears in the html output as para@^{i}tre (in the html
>source: para@^{i}tre, should be para&icirc;tre).
>
>para@^{@dotless{i}}tre leads to the same para@^{i}tre in the html output.
>
>para@^itre gives the right result with texi2html (in html: para&icirc;tre).
>
>The postscript output is right in the second case (para@^{@dotless{i}}tre), 
>in the first and third case there is a i with a dot and a ^ above the dot.
>
>The info output is the same in every cases.
>
>In TeX, the right way of doing what I want to is to do \^\i, but it isn't the
>same in texinfo, i tried similar things, but it doesn't work.
>
>It seems to me that texi2html should handle the para@^{i}tre case, and then I
>think the para@^{@dotless{i}}tre case would be the way to go to a a correct
>document in html and dvi/ps.
>
>Do you agree with this ? If yes I will try to do a patch.
>
>Pat
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>  
>