tests
Dumas Patrice <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:39:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texi2html.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I have added/commited a lot of files in order to have an easy way to test. The test script is test.sh. The tested manuals are: * test cases GermanNodeTest/nodetest.texi, sectionning * "real" manuals texinfo, cvs, xemacs, viper, viper monolithic, texi2html The resulting/reference files are, for each $manual in $manual_res. I have commited the resulting files for GermanNodeTest, xemacs and texi2html because they seem right to me. The cvs manual seems right too, but I am not certain. viper and sectionning manuals have issues with unnumbered sections. the texinfo manual has issues with unnumbered sections, @includecopying, @verb and @verbatim are not handled correctly. I still think that it should be nice to have a test case with some TeX in it. Could you please have a look at the resulting manuals and check that the result is indeed the right one ? Pat