Re: @documentlanguagevariant @documentscript implementation

On Sat, May 02, 2026 at 10:34:44PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 09:15:55PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > I think it is a good idea to make the empty @documentscript reset to the
> > default, so both your examples would be valid.
> 
> I finished the texi2any implementation, and it looks good to me now, I
> tried to avoid differences between C and Perl and also avoid having
> different code paths as best as possible as there are already too
> many...
> 
> Should I start something for the manual or wait for the Texinfo TeX
> implementation?

It's fine to add them to the manual.  I've not had much time to work
on Texinfo in the last couple of weeks but I should be able to add
stub implementations to texinfo.tex quite easily (all that is required
is to save the argument to @documentscript in case of use by translation
files).