Re: "Shadow targets" - an approach to linkable sections without @node

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 09:19:44PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> You can see that nodes have been added by the tree transformation called
> "foo 1", "two" and "two 1".  The "foo 1" node would have been blocked
> by the other node called "node", and "two" and "two 1" would have been
> blocked by each other (as there are two sections called "two", neither
> of which has a @node).

I meant the other node called "foo", not "node".