Re: breadcrumb navigation
Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Patrice Dumas <[email protected]> writes: > In text browser or without CSS more generally, I suspect that the > breadcrumbs would go in the way. Also I guess that the breadcrumbs > replace the current header navigation panel, I am not sure that it is > such a good idea when the node is long or when not split at node. Is that really a reasonable concern to have? That said, I expect that, if implemented as a set of <a>s separated by slashes in a single <div>, it'd render just as: ... Node1 / Node2 / Node3 ... ... and so, not get in the way much. For text viewers (incl. Emacs, which can act as a benchmark), rather than worrying about how w3m or links might render HTML, we ought to revise the Info format to be reflowable and to be able to provide more detailed markup. I wanted to do this at some point, but time escaped me. -- Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 418 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQECBAEWCgCqFiEE/uKz0RP8AKMWLWBhUsKUMB6ixJMFAmp5qVUbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRUUyQjNEMTEzRkMwMEEzMTYyRDYw NjE1MkMyOTQzMDFFQTJDNDkzEBxhcnNlbkBhYXJzZW4ubWUACgkQUsKUMB6ixJNA hAD/fWvz1JOMFjl43BY8N9ylnBDWYFCa3XlevJzYCUx13ZoBAPdY2pN54ziGDL5K EGvPmkLYhTMKt6M37w26Dybd0G0J =/7aU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----