Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?

Patrice Dumas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 07:21:05AM -0800, Raymond Toy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:59 AM Patrice Dumas <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I personally find it kind of weird to mix deffn and defvrx in the same
> block.  If I were writing this from scratch, I would have separated them.
> But this is a conversion of an old Scribe doc, so that's way too much
> effort.  I might just do
> 
> @defun
> @end defun
> @defvar
> <description>
> @end defvar

Seems good enough.

> to get the entries into the right index and still have it look as if
> they're together as in the original doc.  This is mostly busy work.
> 
> Oh, and for the record, look at
> https://cmucl.common-lisp.dev/doc/encycmuclopedia/devenv/cim.ps for the
> original Scribe version.  Look at the bottom of page 7.
> 
> For the conversion, see the bottom of page 6 of
> https://cmucl.common-lisp.dev/docs/hem/cim/cim.pdf
> 
> just so the various bits are in the correct index.

This looks right.

-- 
Pat
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.