Re: Relating multiple index entries to one table item

Gavin Smith <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.general
Message-ID <Y4jvioq06pWZ250E@starmint>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 03:29:34PM +0100, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > It looks like gather_previous_items supports @itemx (at least in the
> > Non-XS parser), so I might be able to figure that out tomorrow, sadly, I
> > am out of time for the day.  Hopefully, it wouldn't be too hard to
> > recover the anchors too (people have taken to like them a lot :) ).
> 
> So, I took a crack at this.
> 
> I managed to implement a tree transform that does a similar association
> that relate_index_entries_to_table_entries_in_tree did, and enabled it
> only in the HTML backend, to produce [1] (note the presence of
> the copyable anchor) from [2].  I'm not sure the approach I took is
> correct, though, but it passes tests (I wasn't entirely sure how to add
> a test for this, so I left testing copyable anchors out for now).

This is great, it looks like you implemented it very simply.  I think
we should definitely include this patch in some form.  Can I sent you
the copyright assignment forms to fill in for the FSF?  (This is usually
a quick process that can be done online.)

I will test this patch when I have time in the next few days.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.