Re: New @link command for plain links

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:17:18PM +0200, Andreas Falkenhahn wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've found a problem now with the new @link command. It happens when using
> constructions like this:
> 
> @example
> @link{One, One}
> Two
> @link{One, Three}
> @end example
> 
> When converting such a texi to pdf, the line "Two", which doesn't have a
> link, uses a different  indentation than the lines "One" and "Three", which
> do have links. Here's a full test file for you to check:

The issue is with the space before the second argument, so the label is
taken as " One" or " Three".  If it had been @link{One,One} and
@line{One,Three} instead the extra space wouldn't have been there.

I have committed a fix in commit 8a467e11c5.  It is still possible that
the space will still appear if the @link command is nested inside some
other construct but we will have to see if that happens in practice.