Re: Cross-reference for a non-English book

> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 08:38:34 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
> 
> > From: Daniel Cerqueira <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Patrice Dumas <[email protected]>,  Daniel Cerqueira
> >  <[email protected]>,  [email protected]
> > Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 21:00:24 +0000
> > 
> > I hate when programs try to be smart, like Emacs was trying to be.
> > Because, then I need to bother people with specialized knowleadge, when
> > this thing should be solved by me picking up the source code and doing
> > some modification. Emacs is doing wrong in this regard, because Emacs
> > should not change the info file output.
> 
> Emacs doesn't yet support well enough Info manuals written in other
> languages (nor translations of documentation in general), so the above
> just means your work (which is of course welcome) will need changes in
> the popular Info readers before it can be considered complete.
> Specifically, the replacement "see" will need to become dependent on
> the manual's language instead of being a hard-coded fixed string.  The
> Info format is not plain text, so expecting to see in an Info reader
> exactly what you see in the Info file is not reasonable.

Btw, what exactly does makeinfo produce for cross-references when
@documentlanguage is not en_US?  Is the "*note" thing still produced,
or is it replaced by something else?  I'm guessing that "*note" is
still produced, since the Info readers need that to recognize a
cross-reference.  And if that is so, then "*note" is still in English,
isn't it, and thus not very different from "see"?

And another question: if Emacs is expected to adapt itself to the
document's language, and for Portuguese produce something like "veja"
instead, then how can Emacs know what that language is?  The
@documentlanguage directive leaves no trace in the Info output,
AFAICT, so what should Emacs do to DTRT here?