Re: Copying image files with HTML output
Dimitris Papavasiliou <[email protected]> Sat, 01 Aug 2026 19:03:34 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Ia2aJSyJH9tZywmxnDl8M_Yuc3fm7x68nMSiIS5Xg2GNsXUadtg8Xx6xH7XsC4JjVRBhZ_fk27JCPSd9x95do088WrFHzu99KCTqK8jJV1U=@protonmail.ch> |
Thank you for the example Gavin. See below for some comments. On Saturday, August 1st, 2026 at 9:42 PM, Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@gmail= .com> wrote: > I do not actually know how this is usually done, but I expect it would be > done with Makefile rules. That is how I do it now. It works fine for me as I can simply do something like 'cp src_dir/*.jpg output_dir/'. It could be more complicated in other cases, for instance if there are other jpg files in there so that a list of all files to be copied would have to be kept as in the example you provided. In my case, the image files are actually generated, so keeping a list of the files expected to be generated, while quite possible, would have been a bit awkward. I'm not complaining; just stating a case as to why such a feature might be useful. > I do not know if this has been considered before or why images aren't > copied automatically for HTML output. (Maybe Patrice will know.) > The only idea I have is that images could take up a lot of disk storage s= pace. This has been in fact discussed before and seemingly deemed desirable. See: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-texinfo/2020-11/msg00181.html Based on the discussion, the implementation seems to have been postponed at the time and has likely then slipped through the cracks. Dimitris