Re: Info enhancements
[email protected] (Karl Berry) Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:27:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.pretest,gmane.emacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For example, currently the Glossary node of the
Emacs Manual has non-functional references that merely has a form of a
simple text "(q.v.)" or "See `default.'".
I see. Yes, this is more or less what anchors were invented for. As
far as glossary entries go, I think that would work ok.
The reference name solution seems too heuristic.
However, I certainly agree with the comment that if we make an anchor
for every index entry, that's too many anchors (it would make the i cmd
a subset of g :). Instead, I think indexes are important enough that
they deserve special treatment.
In fact, we've had this discussion before, in the context of allowing
arbitrary index names (specifically, ones with a :). One message from
that thread is from rms, on 26 Jun 2003 01:30:50 -0400, Message-Id:
<[email protected]>.
If we mark index menus with a special tag, then we can also easily the
exact character or line position within the node for the index entry. I
believe Dave Gillespie (that's my memory, might have been someone else)
implemented a hack for this at one point, but it never made it back
into info.el.
_______________________________________________
Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/
[email protected]
http://ff0.org/mailman/listinfo/texinfo-pretest