Re: new command @s

Torsten Bronger <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:25:15 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.pretest
Organization RWTH Aachen University
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Halloechen!

Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes:

> [...]
>
>> On the other hand, @s for "slanted" is unfortunate in my opinion
>> because it's not intuitive.  Why not @slanted?
>
> All font switches are one-letter commands: @r, @i, @b.  I consider
> @s a natural choice in this context.

I don't like @r either, but it cannot be changed anymore.  Nobody
will think of "slanted" if one sees @s, and vice versa.  As far as I
know Texinfo would be the only markup language where "s" means
"slanted".

I think such an unimportant command can well have a verbose name.
Avoiding unnecessary abbreviations is typical of the GNU project
after all.

Tschoe,
Torsten.

-- 
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus

_______________________________________________
Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/
[email protected]
http://ff0.org/mailman/listinfo/texinfo-pretest