Re: new command @s
Torsten Bronger <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:25:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.pretest |
|---|---|
| Organization | RWTH Aachen University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Halloechen! Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes: > [...] > >> On the other hand, @s for "slanted" is unfortunate in my opinion >> because it's not intuitive. Why not @slanted? > > All font switches are one-letter commands: @r, @i, @b. I consider > @s a natural choice in this context. I don't like @r either, but it cannot be changed anymore. Nobody will think of "slanted" if one sees @s, and vice versa. As far as I know Texinfo would be the only markup language where "s" means "slanted". I think such an unimportant command can well have a verbose name. Avoiding unnecessary abbreviations is typical of the GNU project after all. Tschoe, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus _______________________________________________ Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/ [email protected] http://ff0.org/mailman/listinfo/texinfo-pretest