Re: Devnag package
Chinnaswami Ponnala <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:15:31 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tugindia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEyxwrC=iZC+RzYr+Z7wyHTbz_0NoiymyAkmn4AQBogOUnT-Ag@mail.gmail.com> |
please mail me yr MWF so that I can help u On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to LaTeX, and I am trying to write in Devanagari with it. I have > the "devnag" package, and when I use it, Devanagari script comes out, but > not correctly. > > I think there is something I am missing in my setup, because I noticed in > the .tex file of the manual to the Devanagari package that the author > actually didn't use the standard roman transliteration style to output > Devanagari script. In other words, in the manual it tells you how to write > the Devanagari using the relatively straightforward scheme developed by > Velthuis, but in the actual TeX code of the manual the author uses > something different! > > Now, when I copy the passages written in the .tex file of the manual that > output Devanagari, it comes out clear. So, when I use the scheme that I'm > meant to be using, and write: > > {\devnag dharmak.setre kuruk.setre\\ samavetaa yuyutsava.h\\ maamakaa.h > paa.n.davaa"scaiva kimakurvata sa.mjaya} > > I get a jumble of Devanagari characters which in part resembles what I > wanted to see. However, when I copied what was actually in the .tex file > of the manual to produce the same verse: > > {\dn Dm\0\322w\?/\? \7{k}z\322w\?/\? smv\?tA \7{y}\7{y}(sv,.\\ > mAmkA, pA\317wXvA\396w\4v Ekm\7{k}v\0t s\2jy..\par} > > Then it comes out right. > > It seems there is some kind of file that I haven't put in the right place > or something along those lines. > > I am using a Mac. Also, I am new to LaTeX as well as to the hands-on style > of dealing with the computer, so please be very clear and basic. I am > learning how to use commands in the Terminal program, etc., and don't know > a lot of the concepts and language. > > Does anyone know what I should do? > > Another subsidiary question: Why does the author of the manual use this > other incomprehensible scheme to get the Devanagari output for his manual, > and not the straightforward Velthuis scheme? > > Thank you, > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Home: http://www.tug.org.in/ > TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq > unsubscribe: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tugindia > -- P.Chinnaswami Technical College Dayalbagh Educational Institute Dayalbagh AGRA-282 005 e-mail:[email protected] _______________________________________________ Home: http://www.tug.org.in/ TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq unsubscribe: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tugindia