Re: Chrony not taking SOCKET data from Application

sarveshwar k <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.time.chrony.user
Message-ID <CAAik_WwxT=kH6TMevJctpF3a35qBk3ZsfmRAgcwedGtAhNgBNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Miroslav Lichvar,

Sorry for long log files. Next time I will upload less sized log.

> The reason for chronyc sources sometimes showing 2 as LastRx, even
> when no samples are lost, seems to be incorrect rounding of the sample
> time. I can fix that.

Will there be a release for this fix.
Current version I am using is 3.5 of chrony for which yocto recipe exists.

Thanks & Regards
Sarveshwar.K

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:10 PM Miroslav Lichvar <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 11:52:12AM +0530, sarveshwar k wrote:
> > Hi Miroslav,
> >
> > I have enabled the refclocks logs where I see the PPS signal are
> available.
> > And GPS UTC time comes very fast within a second.
> > Attaches is the refclocks logs. Can you please review once?
>
> Please don't post such large files to the list. Few hundred lines of
> each would be enough, or if needed, upload it on a file hosting
> service and just post the links here.
>
> The logs mostly look good to me. There are some larger offset, but
> it's difficult to tell what is the cause. Could be varying load on the
> CPU, unstable temperature, etc.
>
> The reason for chronyc sources sometimes showing 2 as LastRx, even
> when no samples are lost, seems to be incorrect rounding of the sample
> time. I can fix that.
>
> > CPU is running good and power saving features are not there. Not tried
> with
> > higher PPS rate. Using pps-gpio-poll as kernel module, I see the CPU gets
> > occupied waiting for the edge of clock right.
>
> Right, it's polling for the pin to change. It's more accurate, but
> comes at a cost of the CPU load.
>
> > Through which parameter of chronyc output can we know the synchronization
> > is in micro/nano/seconds?
>
> The RMS offset in tracking report is an indicator of stability. To
> determine accuracy you would need a more accurate time source, e.g. a
> NIC with HW-timestamping PPS input.
>
> > I have made makestep to step if difference is more than 100ns
> continuously,
> > with which I see the system time  is many times 0 seconds slower than NTP
> > time (from the output of tracking). Does this configuration effects
> > anything.
>
> That doesn't do anything useful. It's just stepping the clock to the
> current estimate of true time.
>
> --
> Miroslav Lichvar
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request-kWFZVVI9zxvPqho9SqqRMmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
> with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
> For help email chrony-users-request-kWFZVVI9zxvPqho9SqqRMmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
> with "help" in the subject.
> Trouble?  Email [email protected]
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.