Re: Regarding socket permissions
Morten Nissov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.time.chrony.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGS3e0b6W=_4WeHkUvorVWM=n3ZuFb0b7Wvrxcqpq0KsRQ8eog@mail.gmail.com> |
> > If you really need to, you can change the permissions in the > service/init script after starting chronyd. Instead of setting it to > 0666 it might be better to instead change the owner to the user > running your application. Is there a material difference in performance using SHM vs socket? My understanding was maybe, as SHM polls. If there is no significant difference then I don't really need sockets. Morten On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 9:00 AM Miroslav Lichvar <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 08:46:57AM +0100, Morten Nissov wrote: > > My application opens the socket like GPSD but I don't really have the > > possibility to start it with root privileges. For this reason something > > like the "perm" argument for SHM refclocks would be very useful with the > > socket connection. > > If you really need to, you can change the permissions in the > service/init script after starting chronyd. Instead of setting it to > 0666 it might be better to instead change the owner to the user > running your application. > > -- > Miroslav Lichvar > > > -- > To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request-kWFZVVI9zxvPqho9SqqRMmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org > with "unsubscribe" in the subject. > For help email chrony-users-request-kWFZVVI9zxvPqho9SqqRMmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org > with "help" in the subject. > Trouble? Email [email protected] > >