Re: PPS and NMEA same source not combined

Whetehr it is actually accurate to 300ns is open to debate. It has no way of
knowing what the time lag is between the GPS receiver receiving the second
mark, and the computer actually registring it. Length of the cable from the
receiver to the computer, time of the computer actually registring the arrival
of the leading edge of the pulse. Time required to actually read the system
clock. Those are all places of systematic delays. All chrony can do is to
measure the random delays and errors, and average them out. That gives the
300ns. Without another more accurate timing source you cannot test the
actually accuracy. But I suspect you do not care for that kind of accuracy
anyway.

Secondly, are you sure that your nmea actaully works and is delivering the
time to the computer?If you stop and restart chrony is the time delivered
approximately right? If you look in the chrony logs, do you see the nmea time
being delivered to the machine even if it is not selected?

So what does it say
chronyd
sources

How are you getting the nmea timing?


William G. Unruh __| Canadian Institute for|____ Tel: +1(604)822-3273
Physics&Astronomy _|___ Advanced Research _|____ Fax: +1(604)822-5324
UBC, Vancouver,BC _|_ Program in Cosmology |____ [email protected]
Canada V6T 1Z1 ____|____ and Gravity ______|_    theory.physics.ubc.ca/

On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Mike Smith wrote:

> [CAUTION: Non-UBC Email] Well in theory no one has access apart from me, but yesterday after I was messing about with it, trying to
> get it all working.  Then I looked in more detail PPS working within 300ns wow! but then I looked at the time and date and it was in
> July 2022.  So it was accurate to the second but way out in time and date, rather surprised me.  Was all very odd.
> 
> 
>  
> [t_7edvEm.jpg?v=45]
> Kind regards, Michael A Smith.
> 
> 📲 07973 221971
> 🏠 24, Fifth Avenue, Portsmouth PO6 3PE UK
> 📩 mike-/[email protected]
> My apologies for any incorrect information or typographical errors. Any opinions expressed are my own, and are not intended to
> offend. Anyone offended by anything stated, will likely have offended me, by being inconsiderate of my beliefs.
>  
>
>       On 19 Mar 2023, at 16:22, Bill Unruh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>
>       On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Mike Smith wrote:
>
>             [CAUTION: Non-UBC Email] Ok Bill thanks very much for the comprehensive reply, so in effect I am using
>
>             both effectively by locking my pps against an NMEA, and once it has that pps takes over and NMEA
>
>             ceases to be needed.  So in effect what I am seeing is the correct behaviour and I shouldn’t expect
>
>             anything different.  That’s all great to know, thank you. What mitigation can I add for say someone
>
>       Someone? who else has root on your machine? If it is on the net you can also
>       have other network servers as backups. And nmea is still working I suppose.
>       And if "someone" can change the date, they can also change your chrony.conf
>       and remove the PPS, and do alll sorts of damage.
>
>             changing the date of the machine, as my current method keeps seconds accurately but doesn’t seem to
>
>             test beyond that, so into mins hours and days?  Hope you understand my question.
>
>             Many thanks, Mike.
>
>              
>
>             [t_7edvEm.jpg?v=45]
>
>             Kind regards, Michael A Smith.
>
>             📲 07973 221971
>
>             🏠 24, Fifth Avenue, Portsmouth PO6 3PE UK
>
>             📩 mike-/[email protected]
>
>             My apologies for any incorrect information or typographical errors. Any opinions expressed are my own,
>
>             and are not intended to offend. Anyone offended by anything stated, will likely have offended me, by
>
>             being inconsiderate of my beliefs.
>
>              
> 
>
>                  On 19 Mar 2023, at 00:41, Bill Unruh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>
>                  NMEA is in general a terrible clock, unless what you want to know is "What second is the
>
>                  time at". Delivering an NMEA string takes about 1/10 of a second. 9600Bd, with 10 bits per
>
>                  character, and about 100 characters per string.
>
>                  Compare that to PPS which delivers the "top of the second" to about 1
>
>                  microsecond, 100000 times better. Ie, nmea and pps are completely
>
>                  incomparable. The NMEA is of course critical in telling which second it was
>
>                  that tht PPPS pulse was telling you to the microsecond when it occured. YOu
>
>                  can tell PPS to use NMEA to find out what second it is (it could also use
>
>                  almost any other source on the net as well, but once it has done so, it no
>
>                  longer needs it unless something disasterous happens so that chrony no longer
>
>                  know what second the signal came in on (eg the computer shut down for an hour
>
>                  or more).
> 
>
>                  William G. Unruh __| Canadian Institute for|____ Tel: +1(604)822-3273
>
>                  Physics&Astronomy _|___ Advanced Research _|____ Fax: +1(604)822-5324
>
>                  UBC, Vancouver,BC _|_ Program in Cosmology |____ [email protected]
>
>                  Canada V6T 1Z1 ____|____ and Gravity ______|_    theory.physics.ubc.ca/
> 
>
>                  On Sat, 18 Mar 2023, Mike Smith wrote:
> 
>
>                        [CAUTION: Non-UBC Email] Hi, I have a GPS hat working fine with a steady nice
>
>                        long stream of sats.
> 
>
>                        My chrony conf file has the following refclocks 
> 
>
>                        refclock PPS /dev/pps0 lock nmea refid PPS
> 
>
>                        refclock SHM 0 refid NMEA
> 
>
>                        Chrony eventually chooses my PPS as the current best clock as I would have
>
>                        expected.  Unfortunately the NMEA clock always comes up
> 
>
>                        with the ? Maybe in error when queried from chronyc sources
> 
>
>                        I can’t see why NMEA should be in error when it’s essentially the same source.
>
>                         Is there something I can do to keep pps as current
> 
>
>                        best clock and NMEA to be combined?
> 
>
>                        Sorry if it’s a stupid question
> 
>
>                        Thanks, Mike.
> 
>
>                         
> 
>
>                        Kind regards, Michael A Smith.
> 
>
>                        📩 mike-/[email protected]
> 
>
>                        My apologies for any incorrect information or typographical errors. Any
>
>                        opinions expressed are my own, and are not intended to
> 
>
>                        offend. Anyone offended by anything stated, will likely have offended me, by
>
>                        being inconsiderate of my beliefs.
> 
>
>                         
> 
> 
>