Re: rewrote tests in unittest/ to python unittests
Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.aap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joerg Beyer wrote: > Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Joerg Beyer wrote: > > > Would it be acceptable that running the tests installs unittest.py > > automatically? We should probably ask the user if he really wants to do > > this. That's very much what the package installer already handles. > > I would suggest it this way: If the unittests fail because the module > is not installed (import error), then we can emit an error message that > tells "unittest module is missing, run 'aap install_unittest' to install > it. This will download some python code from sf.net". That would be "aap --install unittest". Still, doing it directly avoids that the user has to type this command. Is there something against doing that? > ps: Bram, since I am on the list, I get ever mail twice that you mail to > me _and_ to the list. Sorry about that. The system I use to store outgoing messages under the name of the person I'm replying to requires this. Hope it's not too annoying. -- The future isn't what it used to be. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// Creator of Vim - Vi IMproved -- http://www.Vim.org \\\ \\\ Project leader for A-A-P -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ Help AIDS victims, buy here: http://ICCF-Holland.org/click1.html /// ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01