Re: dllobject/libobject

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bram Moolenaar" <[email protected]>


> It appears indents are messed up.  Does your mailer replace tabs with a
> space?

Since it's Outlook Express, I expect it to mess up as much as possible.

>
> From the tail of the log:
>
> > depend: 3 - Updating "build-nt\bar.sob" from "bar.d{filetype=3Dd}": no =
> > old signature for "bar.d"
> > extra: Do compile d -> dllobject
> > error: Error in recipe "c:/documents and settings/lars =
> > ivar/aap/startup/dmodule.aap" line 85: Error executing commands for =
> > compile d: Error in recipe "c:/documents and settings/lars =
> > ivar/aap/startup/dmodule.aap" line 32: No commands defined for =
> > compile_dmd dllobject from d
>
> Where did that "compile_dmd" come from?  There must be a
> ":do compile_dmd <file>" somewhere, and there apparently is no
> compile_dmd action defined for a 'dllobject" filetype.

It came from the tool file.

>
> If you can't figure it out, please send the whole dmodule.aap to me,
> otherwise we keep doing it bit by bit.

I have figured it out now. I specified
compile_dmd object,dllobject,libobject d
in the dmd tool file. In the case where these objects would need to
be compiled in different ways or at least with different flags, would
I then need to define D_COMPILE_ACTION,
D_DLL_COMPILE_ACTION, etc?

Also, another problem, dmd don't get the sob DLLOBJSUF, it need
.obj. How/where should this be set up?

A child recipe problem I forgot to mention in my last mail; If the objects
are kept in a subdir and pointed to through :child, there aren't created
any dependency log in the subdirs.

Lars Ivar Igesund



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf