Re: exclusion in file patterns
Aschwin Marsman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.aap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Tim Hemel wrote:
>
> > It would definitely solve my recursive file selection, except for the
> > exclusion, but for that you could use another operator ('-' ?).
> >
> > FILES= `tree("www") - tree("CVS") - tree("*.bak")`
>
> It's not difficult to add an argument to "tree" to define an exclude
> pattern. Also avoids having to walk the tree three times.
Sounds usefull to me. How would you specify this?
> > But then we have another problem, what is meant by *.bak? Just the
> > .bak files in the current directory, or everything that end in .bak ?
>
> Both are needed.
Agreed.
> > I would suggest calling tree something like rglob (recursive glob), if its
> > arguments are going to include wildcards.
>
> rglob() sounds like something that accepts "**" for a pattern:
> rglob("**/*.bak"). It's OK for how you use it above, but when adding an
> "exclude" argument I suppose it's better not to use "glob" in the name.
> It's quite an obscure name anyway.
OK.
> > Too bad that the - operator is not defined for lists in Python, but we can
> > probably overload it.
>
> There is probably a good reason why it wasn't defined in Python.
>
> It's quite easy to do all this with one tree() function that takes
> multiple arguments.
This is something I would use.
> > The rglob/tree function definitely is useful, I think.
>
> I suppose so. Something similar was recently mentioned on the SCons
> maillist.
>
> - Bram
Have a nice weekend,
Aschwin Marsman
--
[email protected] http://www.marsman.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf