Re: adding {noinstall} to ltlibs (and others)
Adriaan de Groot <adridg-FlD2LfDziEhmR6Xm/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.aap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 14:20, you wrote:
> Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > The attached patch (named libtool.diff, but it's for RecPython.py and
> > libtool.aap) adds support for a {noinstall} attribute. See, it _can_ be
> > useful to have a :ltlib that isn't installed - for support code
> > internal to an application composed of multiple executables, for
> > instance.
>
> Yes, it can be useful to build something but not install it. But this
> is already possible. From the docs of ":ltlib":
I suppose that works, though it's lacking the clarity and intuitiveness of
{noinstall}. So ignore this patch.
> I'm also still waiting for a fix for the empty lines in the examples
> (only in the split-up HTML files, the one-big-file is OK).
Ugh, xslt stylesheet hacking again. I'll pick this up when I get all of KPilot
built and installed using Aap, OK?
> Oh and I noticed the PDF file doesn't skip to the next page to start a
> new chapter. I wonder if that can be fixed.
It looks like .. no. Not with htmldoc, at least.
--
pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot <[email protected]>
If the door is ajar, can we fill it with door-jamb?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php