Re: New to aap: misc. problems
Adriaan de Groot <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:17:38 +0200 (MEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.aap.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Rainer Michael Schmid wrote: > - The add_LIBS option passes the arguments (as it seems) directly. This Aap is still evolving, don't forget that. It's not been used on every possible platform yet. > the -framework flag). But I wonder why the design decision was to > specify libraries via -l and not in an abstract manner. Probably because then ther would need to be some (platform x compiler) -specific way to convert the list of desired libraries to something suitable for the linker being used. > - I took a look at the source code of the Qt module and it seems that a > lot of special things are hardcoded (I haven't tried it yet, but that > will come soon). E.g. the default for the directory of the Qt > installation is /usr/local/qt-3.2 (i.e. even ther version is hardcoded The Qt stuff is mine, and since there is _no_ standard place to look for Qt (well, I could have chosen /usr/X11R6), this is what you get. Patches are welcome, of course (to this list) with an exhaustive search of all the possible default places it could be. > -- I believe one could try a bit harder to find the right Qt > installation). The generated .cpp file from a .ui file is modified in a > strange way (some KDE stuff is done, so you probably can't use it for a > Qt only project). That's true - since I wrote the Qt stuff to support the KDE module that never materialized, and in KDE you munge the moc a bit. > The handling of the moc is also done in a > non-standard way that can cause problems. How so? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com