Hierarchical builds (Was: Re: Linking a program with a directory??)
Magnus Therning <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:36:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.aap.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I decided to split off the discussion to make each thread about one
thing and one thing only :-)
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
>> Of course I had to try out the hierarchical build as well. Again I got
>> stuck though :-(
>>
>> main.aap:
>>
>> :child foo/main.aap
>> :child bar/main.aap
>>
>> foo/main.aap:
>>
>> :dll foo : foo.c
>>
>> bar/main.aap:
>>
>> :program { add_LIBS = $(DLLPRE)foo$(DLLSUF) }
>> : main.c
>
>The foo library was created in the "foo" directory, thus in the "bar"
>directory you need to use "../foo/$(DLLPRE)foo$(DLLSUF)".
I have now modified my aap files like this:
main.aap:
:child foo/main.aap
:child bar/main.aap
foo/main.aap:
:dll foo : foo.c
bar/main.aap:
all: bar
INCLUDE = -I../foo
:program { add_LIBS = ../foo/$(DLLPRE)foo$(DLLSUF) } bar
: main.c
This doesn't work, because aap doesn't connect
'../foo/$(DLLPRE)foo$(DLLSUF)' with ':dll foo : foo.c' dependency-wise.
Is this something that is being worked on?
I'd even like to see that the following would create such a dependency
connection:
:program { add_LDFLAGS = -L../foo } { add_LIBS = -lfoo } bar
: main.c
In my perception this would bring aap to place where recursive aap files
can't be considered harmful in the same way makefiles are[1].
/M
1. http://aegis.sourceforge.net/auug97.pdf
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
[email protected]
http://magnus.therning.org/
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried
it.
-- Donald Knuth
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBAjujiMWTaatN+6QRAhBGAKCxe/AFcNrfLyi75smL/xKVUtt/mgCg2xl3 TUqh42eKHiZqQWp8ArgKsk4= =POpj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----