Re: [PATCH] sim/microblaze/interp.c: Use long int format instead of int to avoid compiling warnings
Chen Gang <[email protected]> Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:07:57 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.cgen.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/01/2014 08:43 AM, Michael Eager wrote: > On 06/30/14 17:14, Chen Gang wrote: >> The related warnings (cross compile microblaze-linux-elf): >> >> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function >> ‘microblaze_extract_unsigned_integer’: >> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:53:6: warning: format >> ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long >> unsigned int’ [-Wformat] >> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function ‘sim_size’: >> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:329:4: warning: >> format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 3 has type >> ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat] >> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c: In function >> ‘set_initial_gprs’: >> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:360:7: warning: >> format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 3 has type >> ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat] >> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/microblaze/interp.c:360:7: warning: >> format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 >> has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat] >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <[email protected]> >> --- >> sim/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ >> sim/microblaze/interp.c | 6 +++--- >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/sim/ChangeLog b/sim/ChangeLog >> index 35d0920..03c244b 100644 >> --- a/sim/ChangeLog >> +++ b/sim/ChangeLog >> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ >> +2014-07-01 Chen Gang <[email protected]> >> + >> + * sim/microblaze/interp.c: Use long int format instead of int >> + format to avoid compiling warnings. >> + >> 2014-03-12 Nick Clifton <[email protected]> >> >> * MAINTAINERS: Add myself as the maintainer for the MSP430. > > Please put your ChangeLog in the email, not in a patch. OK, thanks. I shall notice about it next time. If necessary to send patch v2 for it, please let me know. > >> diff --git a/sim/microblaze/interp.c b/sim/microblaze/interp.c >> index cc61278..e92a1d0 100644 >> --- a/sim/microblaze/interp.c >> +++ b/sim/microblaze/interp.c >> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ microblaze_extract_unsigned_integer (unsigned char >> *addr, int len) >> >> if (len > (int) sizeof (unsigned long)) >> printf ("That operation is not available on integers of more than " >> - "%d bytes.", sizeof (unsigned long)); >> + "%ld bytes.", sizeof (unsigned long)); >> >> /* Start at the most significant end of the integer, and work towards >> the least significant. */ >> @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ sim_size (int size) >> { >> if (issue_messages) >> fprintf (stderr, >> - "Not enough VM for simulation of %d bytes of RAM\n", >> + "Not enough VM for simulation of %ld bytes of RAM\n", >> CPU.msize); >> >> CPU.msize = 1; >> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ set_initial_gprs () >> memsize = CPU.msize / (1024 * 1024); >> >> if (issue_messages > 1) >> - fprintf (stderr, "Simulated memory of %d Mbytes (0x0 .. 0x%08x)\n", >> + fprintf (stderr, "Simulated memory of %ld Mbytes (0x0 .. >> 0x%08lx)\n", >> memsize, CPU.msize - 1); >> >> /* Clean out the GPRs */ > > > Commit ba8e7d1e2. Excuse me, I do not quite undersand the meaning. I guess it means: "have applied this patch, and its' commit number is ba8e7d1e2...", If what I guess is incorrect, please let me know, and I shall send patch v2 for it. Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed