Re: id field
Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:31:52 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.memaid.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ghent University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 10 November 2003 20:02, David Calinski wrote: > Well. Any change of format is a good occasion to think about changes in > general. As we break some compatibility, this is an occasion to introduce > more changes without breaking it more. I see you point. Now that we're defining the XML data format it makes sense to see if people have certain wishes that the core can support. > > If having an 'id' element is a problem with reserved keywords in XML, > > then just rename it to 'descr' or whatever when exporting the XML. > > But is anyone use "id" as a description field? Oh, I was just using 'descr' as an example. Another option would be to name it 'string_that_might_have_some_use_in_the_future_although_were_not_really_sure_what_to_use_it_for_right_now> ;-) Peter -- ------------------------------------------------ Peter Bienstman Ghent University, Dep. of Information Technology Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium tel: +32 9 264 34 45, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 WWW: http://photonics.intec.ugent.be email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/