Re: id field

David Calinski <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:20:00 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tools.memaid.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 10 of November 2003 22:48, Peter Bienstman wrote:
> On Monday 10 November 2003 22:36, David Calinski wrote:
> > As for now it seems to me that nobody wants "id" and "desc" fields in XML
> > but we all discuss how to implement it...
>
> Feel free to remove them ;-)

Heh. ;)
I would like to wait a bit, don't make fast decisions - maybe someone 
(especially Richard, I still wait for his answer...) will enlighten me that 
one or both these fields can be really usefull.

So I actually wait for any "Yes, I want it! With it I can ...". :)
If no-one will say that then I guess we will forget about it.
In the meantime I still try to think how "id" could be useful, maybe I omitted 
something... (?)

(Peter, "id" field will stay in "struct elem" anyways, as long as you need it 
- this is no problem. But it's not related to XML format.)


DC




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/