Re: id field
David Calinski <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:20:00 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.memaid.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 10 of November 2003 22:48, Peter Bienstman wrote: > On Monday 10 November 2003 22:36, David Calinski wrote: > > As for now it seems to me that nobody wants "id" and "desc" fields in XML > > but we all discuss how to implement it... > > Feel free to remove them ;-) Heh. ;) I would like to wait a bit, don't make fast decisions - maybe someone (especially Richard, I still wait for his answer...) will enlighten me that one or both these fields can be really usefull. So I actually wait for any "Yes, I want it! With it I can ...". :) If no-one will say that then I guess we will forget about it. In the meantime I still try to think how "id" could be useful, maybe I omitted something... (?) (Peter, "id" field will stay in "struct elem" anyways, as long as you need it - this is no problem. But it's not related to XML format.) DC ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/