Re: NOPASSWD sudo and PAM
"Todd C. Miller" <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Jan 2018 05:33:31 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.sudo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:22:21 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Kope=c4=8dek?= wrote: > is there a difference w.r.t. PAM stack interaction for NOPASSWD vs > PASSWD sudoers entries? If NOPASSWD is set or if the time stamp file allows the user to run commands without authentication then only the PAM session modules will be called. That means that pam_authenticate() is not called so the account modules will not be run. I'm not aware of a way to have the account module called without using pam_authenticate(). I don't think this is a bug, it is just an effect of disabling authentication. - todd ____________________________________________________________ sudo-workers mailing list <[email protected]> For list information, options, or to unsubscribe, visit: https://www.sudo.ws/mailman/listinfo/sudo-workers