Re: Kerberize sudo
"Todd C. Miller" <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:29:58 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tools.sudo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:22:29 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q?Pavel_B=c5=99ezina?= wrote: > we would like to implement kerberos authentication for sudo as an > alternative to NOPASSWD in environments where other means of > authentication are not available (e.g. when user logs in with smartcard > to a remote machine where the smartcard is not physically available and > passwords can not be used). > > The basic idea is to provide new option as an alternative to NOPASSWD > and !authenticate. Lets say GSSPAPI. So the administrator can configure > what rules can use kerberos ticket for authentication and what rules > must go through pam. > > If a rule has GSSAPI set, kerberos authentication will be attempted. If > it is not set, pam authentication will be used. > > We want to check before we start coding - is this something that sudo > upstream would accept? It sounds like what you want is a hybrid approach where GSSAPI is used to verify the Kerberos credentials but PAM is still used to setup the session. Is that correct? - todd ____________________________________________________________ sudo-workers mailing list <[email protected]> For list information, options, or to unsubscribe, visit: https://www.sudo.ws/mailman/listinfo/sudo-workers