Comparing -k and -K

Greetings:

In sudo(8), I find the following descriptions of the "-k" and "-K"
options...

> -K, --remove-timestamp
>   Similar to the -k option, except that it removes the user's cached
>   credentials entirely and may not be used in conjunction with
>   a command or other option.  This option does not require a password.
>   Not all security policies support credential caching.
>
> -k, --reset-timestamp
>   When used without a command, invalidates the user's cached
>   credentials.  In other words, the next time sudo is run a password
>   will be required.  This option does not require a password, and was
>   added to allow a user to revoke sudo permissions from a .logout
>   file.
>   ...

In my ~/.bash_logout file, I would like to do something similar to:

  if [[ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]]; then
    /usr/bin/sudo -k
  fi

The documentation above suggests that "-k" was added to support revoking
"sudo" permissions in a ~/.logout file or similar.

However, from reading, it seams that "-K" may be better for this purpose
since it removes the cached credentials entirely. Is this correct?

If I want to revoke permissions in my ~/.bash_logout file, which one of
these options is recommended?

Is "-K" better/stronger than "-k"?

Many thanks,

-- 
Jason Franklin
____________________________________________________________
sudo-users mailing list <[email protected]>
For list information, options, or to unsubscribe, visit:
https://www.sudo.ws/mailman/listinfo/sudo-users