IMPORTANT: It's time to migrate from CVS (your input needed)
Nick Morrott <[email protected]> Sat, 7 Oct 2017 17:56:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tv.xmltv.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOQWjw1tciDDd3mHWbE9Wa2G1G8TyHSQtWEgi4JqAJgFbDf+9Q@mail.gmail.com> |
* Please read and contribute to the discussion * I'm forwarding details of an important notification from Sourceforge that I received earlier today: "Greetings project admin, We have been planning to discontinue CVS support here at SourceForge for several years now, and that time has finally arrived. Since your project is making use of CVS for your source version control, you should now convert your repository over to another version control system. The current plan is to stop allowing CVS commits by November 30th. To be able to continue making source code changes you’ll need to have your CVS repo converted by then." Next steps: =========== The Sourceforge announcement answers the question of *when* we have to move away from CVS on sourceforge, but *not* to which replacement VCS/platform. I'd like to hear from all active admins/developers to gauge how we as a project migrate from CVS, in terms of which VCS we choose, and on which service/platform the project is hosted. It is perfectly possible to stay with Sourceforge and migrate to svn/git "in place". Questions: ========== Please answer these two important questions: 1) Which version control system would you like to use instead of CVS? 2) Which platform would you like the project's code to be hosted on? I'd say we have about 4 weeks to reach a decision, until we need to start getting ready for the planned migration away from CVS. Sourceforge will disable CVS commits by end of November 2017. My 10c: ======= As I've indicated over the past couple of years I'm still 100% certain that moving to the git VCS is the most appropriate migration from CVS. As a project we already have an account reserved on github, and I have been maintaining a CVS->git mirror for some years which allows for build testing (via TravisCI across 10 distros) and easier development. Moving to SVN would be, in my opinion, a backwards step and do nothing to: * attract new developers; * ensure the project's full development history is as widely available as possible; and * improve the local development/testing experience My thanks to all fellow XMLTV developers past, present and future! Let's get the discussion started. Cheers, Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ xmltv-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmltv-devel