Re: RFC: Renaming grabbers
Gary Buhrmaster <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:23:24 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tv.xmltv.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMfXtQzCfVmnYS84OrFBuMw-xHiXMk1Peb0cVE9DQRV96nK5qw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Robert Eden <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure git can move a file/folder w/o losing the history (that's a > benefit of git) Git tries to be smart about such things, but for those that do not want to remember the three commands to do it (mv; git-rm; git-add), there is always git-mv (a convenience function). And as with much else, if you work it hard enough, you can likely confuse git. Commit early and often is usually the best approach to keep you (and git) happier and keep the history understandable. I personally dislike seeing a single commit that include 20 mostly unrelated changes that could be (and should be) separated into individual commits for history purposes. [FD: I have been guilty of the single commit to rule them all practice at times, especially for new development before I bring the project under a VCS. But I am trying to reform.] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot