Re: @PageMark and @Tbl width=expand option not playing nicely together?
"Michael Koehmstedt, RenPet" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.type-setting.lout |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJuzuAE88o9Ox9tWvaaauRsLCqkpxeTgfOgH37rYNto5paZBRg@mail.gmail.com> |
Ok, I added in a newline // between the PageMark and the table and that worked, thanks. On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Valeriy E. Ushakov <[email protected]>wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 19:44:27 -0700, Michael Koehmstedt, RenPet wrote: > > > For some reason, when I try to use @PageMark prior to a table with > > width=expand, I'm getting an error. Sample program: > > > > @SysInclude { tbl } > > @SysInclude { doc } > > > > @Doc @Text @Begin > > > > @PageMark sig.table > > Add // here > > > @Tbl > [...] > > Comment out the @PageMark and it runs fine. Comment out the width option > > and it works fine. However, with the @PageMark and width=expand in there > > I'm getting the result: > > > > 6,1: 80.000c object deleted (too wide for 15.989c paragraph) > > > > > > I don't understand why using a @PageMark should effect the output so > much. > > Why would it just arbritrarily expand the table to 80 cm wide?? > > Lout treats input whitespace as paragraph concatenation (&). > > -uwe > >