Re: Experiences with Lout
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.type-setting.lout |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 20:20:05 +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
> - Overheads: with @Lectures the default @OverheadNumInDisplays { No } seems
> not to be applied.
There's a typo in slidesf in def @Overhead invocation of
@LargeScaleStructure, the at-sign is lost in:
indisplays { OverheadNumInDisplays }
> - @*NumberedDisplay number format: left side numbers are not possible :(
Looks like unedited copy-paste in bsf.
> - I personally think the Plain and PDF export is useless and can be
> dropped. Both work only very limited and there are tools
> available to convert from PS to PDF to TXT and back.
Isn't it a bit rash to dismiss a feature that you don't use as
universally useless?
I personally find plain text extremely useful for debugging
definitions or doing a quick test (lout -p -s | cat -s).
Other people find PDF useful because when you need to generate simple
PDFs well within limitations of the pdf backend, you save time/space
on not having ghostscript around.
-uwe