Re: Is it possible to use @Pipe in a def?

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 16:31:04 +0100, Mark Summerfield wrote:

> Thanks uwe, in view of that I'll keep using my current idiom.

Now that you have figured out that cross-reference example from the
other thread you can use @Filter here directly too instead of @Pipe.

-uwe