Re: baz format archives in tla
Thomas Lord <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matthieu Moy wrote: > Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Besides, my understanding was that the ultimate goal was to remove the >> obligation to use a `c--b--v' name space, and that this archive format >> change was one step in this direction. Is this correct? > Yes, it was the plan, and it has been abandoned. You are not in a position to make such assertions. You are talking about other people's intentions, plans, potential plans, etc. The truth is closer to: That work is not taking place right now because there are not sufficient resources available. The current tla line of development is being maintained conservatively -- it is unlikely changes along those lines will appear on that line unless a volunteer creates them. Among the many tasks suspended for want of resources, it is not completely clear where such changes fit into the priority list or technical plan. -t