Re: Re: baz format archives in tla
"Andy Tai" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/7/06, James Blackwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Bazaar-1.x (only developed for about 6 months) dealt with this by removing > the redundant path elements in a way that allowed room for stripping out > categories, versions or branches (that's why this--that--xx/ instead of > this/that/xx/) > > I suggest that Gnu Arch either take this fix or implement something I assume you refer to the baz format, which support was merged in to tla by Tom. > different different with similiar results. Most large projects are > concerned about portability as their developers live on heterogenous > platforms. Arguing "I can browse my archive in emacs" doesn't sell well > when considered within the context of perl & python w/ or w/o modules, > apache, php, SDL games, or much of anything available via cygwin or mingw. The latest tla also incorporated Lode Leroy's path compression patch. That makes tla usable on top of cygwin.