Re: planning 2.0? (was re: Google...)
"Andy Tai" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/20/06, Aldrik KLEBER <[email protected]> wrote: > For the moment Arch with tla is limited to POSIX environment, > should we > considered that it is a ARCH requirement, or on only a caracteristic of > the > first implementation of ARCH ? Should we imagine that ARCH can be open to > non > POSIX SYSTEM (Mainframe, etc ...) ? > > I think it is well agreed that the current tla's strong ties to "certain aspects" (but not all) of the POSIX environment is a weakness and to work well on Microsoft Windows is a desired feature for Arch 2.0 and Tom's prototype clearly shows that. Andy Tai, [email protected]