Re: planning 2.0?

"Andy Tai" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
James I don't think this is an issue here.  Arch was of Tom's design and
Arch 2.0 is still Tom's design.  So it is great that Tom is leading the
discussion and if Tom wants to push Arch 2.0 forward I am all for it.

I have kept tla alive, but for major advancements Tom is the best person to
push for them and to lead the community to achieve them.  (Yes, I still keep
tla alive.  Tla is not going anywhere but won't see any big changes either)

On 4/23/06, James Blackwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Andy has done a very good job running GnuArch. He communicates well, is
> skilled at avoiding minefields on this list, is open to ideas from
> everyone on the group and seeks consensus. I nominate Andy Tai to stay in
> charge of GnuArch.
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.