Re: GNU Arch wiki being moved

The V2-only wiki status is unfortunate and I'd add it to the
list of what I think are Canonical's gratuitous
`screw you' behavior visited upon the GNU Arch project.

But, there's an opportunity for good to come of it.

In my opinion, GPL V3 (and let's please not debate it here)
has a lot to offer.   I ask/suggest that Arch fans learn about it
and particularly suggest speeches where Eben Moglen
himself talks about it.   See:

   http://gplv3.fsf.org/av

and more generally

  http://gplv3.fsf.org


-t


Andy Tai wrote:
>
>
> On 6/17/06, *Mikhael Goikhman* <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:>
>
>     > >As a new owner, will you change the license of new contributions to
>     > >"GPL v2 or later"? This strong anti-FSF-trust position was the
>     reason
>     > >I stopped to contribute to the wiki two years ago.
>     >
>     > It it so now for new pages.
>
>     OK, although I didn't speak about pages, but about implicit license of
>     new contributions (to either old or new pages).
>
>
> Due to "copyleft", licensing conditions of new contributions to old 
> pages must be the same.  So we cannot extend the use of GPL v3 or 
> later onto these pages. 
>
>     Regards,
>     Mikhael.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Andy Tai, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/