Re: OpenBSD madness...

Also, my name does not belong in the copyright
notice for that file.

-t


Thomas Lord wrote:
> In general, the GNU Arch coding standard has been to
> avoid certain C99 features (so, not "//" comments, no local
> variable declarations in the middle of code) and to
> not indent code in the manner of a monkey on meth and
> in the midst of a psychotic breakdown.   So, yes,
> cmd-export.c could use some work.
>
> Much, but not all of the indenting weirdness of the
> file appears to be the result of someone editing code
> with tab width set to 4 characters.  Other parts -- well,
> I can't even begin to imagine what the author(s) were
> thinking.
>
> Sigh.
>
> Hey, Andy.... um.... huh?
>
> -t
>
>
> Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>>    > {
>>    >   int foo;
>>    >   foo = 0;
>>    >   int bar;
>>    > }
>>
>>    These are not silly. This was not a valid "C" last time I checked.
>>
>> It is valid GNU C though, and I think it might be valid C99.  But I
>> don't have the standard at hand.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>>
>> GNU arch home page:
>> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
>>
>>   
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
>