Re: pushing to mirrors.sourcecontrol.net

Miles Bader wrote:
> Thomas Lord <[email protected]> writes:
>   
>> And, in the news: yes, I do actually plan to start releasing
>> code for Arch 2.0, within some small number of days.  There
>> won't be enough there, initially, to migrate to but, for what
>> it's worth, that's coming up and is probably relevant to the I.T.
>> questions.
>>     
>
> So what sort of design did you end up with?  My impression from before
> is that it was roughly going to be sort of a mix of a vaguely git-ish
> low-level with a more arch-ish user layer on top of it?
>   

It will take a while to fully explain, really, but yes -- your impression
is still correct, as far as it goes.



> [That would be cool ... I'm a big fan of git's basic design, and the
> fact that every operation is mind-blowingly fast is a rather nice change
> from arch (where everything is .... slow), but when I've tried to set it
> up to my own preferences, I could never quite get it to do the right
> thing...  I think git is a great advance, but there's a lot that still
> needs to be worked out.]
>   


Sounds about right.

-t



> -Miles
>
>